Review – To Rome With Love

                    Rating = ★★      Tagline = Low Rental

Woody Allen can be inconsistent. He’ll release an absolute great movie, or masterpiece, then follows it up with a mess. With Midnight in Paris being so marvelous, I wasn’t going in expecting anything near that level of quality. Aside from one point in time where it was just great movie after great movie coming out; you get great, then passable. The weird thing about To Tome With Love is that it really feels like separate movies unfinished. Instead of making different movies for each one, they were all combined. I really hope Allen hasn’t made his last movie. I know he hasn’t, but someone of his magnitude should go out on a much stronger note. What makes this one of his worst, is it comes off as uninspired. It felt like a rushed idea not given thought beyond the absolute basics. It has some nice moments throughout, but just like Allen, inconsistent describes this well. No one can capture a picturesque city as beautifully as Allen does, though.

Four stories are present. The first is about Jerry (Woody Allen), a retired – pretty successful career – and is visiting Rome with his wife (Judy Davis). The purpose of the visit is to meet their daughters (Alison Pill) finance. He isn’t particularly fond of him after getting to spend time with Michelangelo (Flavio Parenti). But, one-day Jerry hears Michelangelo’s father (real-life opera singer Fabio Armiliato) singing in the shower; it sounds wonderful. When Jerry tries to record a demo; he can’t seem to be as great; there might be an answer staring them in the face though. A second story involves Jack (Jessie Eisenberg) falling for Monica (Ellen Page), some complications stand in the way; Alec Baldwin features in this story. The Third involves a simple story of a man trying to pass a hooker (Penelope Cruz) off as his wife. The fourth and final – and worse – is a tale about people being famous for being famous. Forgive my lack of detail in all save for the first; can’t really remember and not worth looking up for the information.

The story isn’t structured all that well. When you have completely different stories, they usually intersect somehow in the end. While this doesn’t necessarily have to happen, most of the time it’s the best thing to do; if it doesn’t, the stories should work well enough on their own. Maybe even have a similar theme. Here, there are no similarities between them in the least – all could have easily been separate movies. Every time they cut away to another story; it felt uneven. I didn’t think any of them were bad, but some were definitely better than others. By far, the most pointless story was the one dealing with fame. Every time it would cut away from another story I wouldn’t be too pleased. The best one by far is the one featuring Allen. It would have been more beneficial if all stories were cut save for Allen’s and Eisenberg’s.

A smile or two in the crowd, but the rest; not so much.

Woody Allen wrote and directed. Most of his career has been a love letter to New York City; well now he’s exploring other places. I’m not going to use the term “auto pilot directing” because it would be disrespectful in this case. He just does what he usually does – all it lacks is the flare that say Midnight in Paris had. Same style with less attention to detail. The script is forty/sixty. A good deal of things seemed simply filling to achieve a certain running time. I doubt this was in anyone’s min; the best of Allen’s movies haven’t been very lengthy. Some stuff was given some thought and worked to a point. I hated characters; some though I genuinely liked. The jokes were an even split. At times, they would fall flat, but at other times you laugh – quite a bit I might add. Another mixed thing is the messages or deep dialog didn’t often work. While not an atrocious of a mess; the script and direction come out as some form of a mess.

The performances are good – not great. The standout’s are Woody Allen and Alec Baldwin. Woody Allen is of course playing himself, but he was a joy to watch. His performance elevates his lines because of his delivery. He is also the only thing that brought me consistent laughs. Baldwin is laid back and gives off some decent charisma; in short, he was likeable. Jesse Eisenberg is back playing Micheal Cera clone. Over the course of a year or two I’ve come to the conclusion he is a solid actor. Here, doesn’t showcase anything, simply passable; the same thing can be said about Ellen Page. Penelope Cruz’s character didn’t belong in the movie in the first place, and she just doesn’t seem to try at all. She coasted through. Robert Benigni, Judy Davis and Alison Pill are fine. Pill seems to be coming gout in great stuff lately – Goon, Scott Pilgrim vs the World – she’s someone to keep an eye on.

Woody Allen’s acting was the main saving grace of To Rome With Love. It was great seeing him do his thing on screen again; he can still be him extremely well. Overall, this is a mess. Jumbled ideas were just thrown around on the screen. Since I love Woody Allen movies, some positives could just be with me personally. If you aren’t a big Allen fan, don’t bother seeing this. When I mean big, I mean big. Just because you loved Midnight in Paris and Annie Hall doesn’t mean you’ll feel the same about this. However, if you find something in all of his movies – there are worse rentals. There hasn’t been an Allen film I haven’t enjoyed on some level. This is so subjective and even for those who’ll like won’t love it. Mixed feelings presented itself with my viewing. I admit; it’s somewhat entertaining. Still, it might be too subjective for its own good. By now, you can tell if this is for you or not.

12 thoughts on “Review – To Rome With Love

  1. I heard that Woody Allen combined a bunch of ideas he never used to make this movie. I missed in it theaters, but I don’t really regret not seeing it. Nice review.

  2. I think one of Allen’s flaws is his need to release a film every year. With that type of output your quality will suffer.

    I do wish he would return to “Sleeper” territory, but I want hold my breadth.

    Good review.

  3. This was a really slapdash production. Although I was a bit more generous in grading than you were, I did feel very cheated. Woody Allen had one-liners galore (I loved the Euros confusion and not being able to translate the Italian word for “imbecile”), but overall, it was an underwhelming and poorly structured production. Alec Baldwin got on my nerves as well. Good review.

    • Woody Allen staring saved everything, he had great lines at times. While Alec Baldwin didn’t really get on my nerves that much, but over time he started a little. I was mixed; so middle rating worked in this case. Thanks.

  4. Currently working my way through this, but I completely agree with your review, it really is a messy movie. Personally I like the concept of the fame bits, only up to now it seems like a one joke piece which doesn’t evolve…still have to watch the last 20 minutes, but I guess it won’t change much. I’m pretty sure I’ll give it quite a low score.

    • I liked the idea of the fame part, I just didn’t think it was done al that well. While I didn’t hate it, it deserves my middle score. Can be liked to a point by certian people, but in the end – just meh.

  5. This was a letdown. The movie had some bright spots, but it was a mess. My favorite was the Penélope Cruz storyline. Loved that one and her in that role. She’s one of my favorite actresses.

  6. Woody Allen is either a hit or miss for me. I fell in love with Midnight in Paris, but I have no plan on seeing To Rome With Love, the trailer did nothing for me. It’s nice to know some of the performances were good though.

    • If your hit and miss on Allen, I don’t think you’ll enjoy this at all. Everyone who has said that have told me they hated it. It’s strictly if your a big Allen fan – even then it’s average, maybe slightly below.


Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s